Pricing depends on site count, scope, documentation volume, interviews, observation requirements, travel and report depth.
Test whether the current security structure still works.
A security audit examines whether current controls, procedures and deployment operate as intended and remain aligned with the risk.
A review of an existing security system, provider, procedures and management information.
Procurement, risk, facilities and operations teams that need evidence about current performance and control gaps.
Johannesburg, Gauteng and requirements elsewhere in South Africa subject to scope and mobilisation review.
A deployed control can weaken without being visibly removed.
Procedures drift, responsibilities change, reporting becomes routine and site conditions evolve. An audit tests whether the system remains effective.
Review controls against reality.
Understand the risk and operating environment.
Define the scope, responsibilities and controls.
Deploy the agreed people, process or specialist support.
Report, learn and improve against the requirement.
Alpha compares the documented security structure with site conditions, observed practice and management needs, then prioritises improvements.
Direct answers before the next step.
What is the difference between a risk assessment and security audit?
A risk assessment identifies threats and vulnerabilities. An audit tests whether existing controls and deployment are operating effectively against the requirement.
Can Alpha audit an existing provider?
Yes, subject to an agreed, objective scope and access to the relevant site information and stakeholders.
Know the risk.
Define the response.
Give Alpha Threat enough context to recommend the right security structure.